Blog

FTC hits company hard for engaging in unauthorized recurring charges - Includes violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act

Posted by Clyde Hutchins | Aug 31, 2016 | 0 Comments

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently entered a stipulated order against several defendants in the "IWorks" case that the FTC brought in 2010. The FTC alleged that the defendants "took more than $280 million from consumers via deceptive “trial” memberships for bogus government-grant and money-making products." The stipulated order includes a monetary judgment of over $280 million and several terms related to the requirements of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. As I recently mentioned, when I worked for the Attorney General's Office, I frequently saw companies falling short of the requirements of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA). The stipulated order recognizes the deficiencies I often saw. In the stipulated order, the FTC outlines what I conclude is the FTC's view of the legal requirements under the EFTA.

1) First, the stipulated order prohibits the defendants from:

"Engaging in any recurring debiting of a consumer's account without first obtaining a valid written pre-authorization for preauthorized electronic fund transfers from the consumer's account, which pre-authorization is clear and readily understandable, identifiable as a pre-authorization and, reflects the consumer's assent. . ."

The FTC's order reinforces the point that the EFTA prohibits companies from making electronic fund transfers from a consumers account with explicit authorization. Hidden or implied authorizations are not allowed. The consumer must be able to readily understand that by clicking on the website or signing an order form that the consumer is authorizing the merchant to debit his or her bank account. If the consumer does not know that they authorized a transfer, the company may be in violation of the EFTA.

2) Second, the order prohibits the defendants from:

"Engaging in any recurring debiting of a consumer's account without first providing a copy of a valid written pre-authorization to the consumer for preauthorized electronic fund transfers from the consumer's account which copy is clear and readily understandable, identifiable as a pre-authorization and, reflects the consumer's assent. . ."

As I mentioned earlier this month, companies need to provide consumers with a copy of the authorization for preauthorized transfers from the consumer's account. This needs to be in writing and can be provided by email or regular mail. A failure to provide that copy can result in a violation of the EFTA. The notice should include the timing of the preauthorized transfers and the amounts.

3) Third, the order prohibits the defendants from:

"Failing to maintain procedures reasonably adapted to avoid an unintentional failure to obtain a written authorization for preauthorized electronic fund transfers as required in Section 205.10(b)(7) of the Federal Reserve Board's Official Staff Commentary to Regulation E."

This section of the order is really fact specific. The requirement to maintain procedures to avoid errors depends greatly upon the type of procedures that the company uses in transacting with consumers. This will be different for each company, its marketing efforts, its online presence and the products or services it offers. Notably, the legal requirements and the language of the order use the word, "reasonably." This provides a little leeway for bona fide errors.

If you need assistance with ensuring that your company complies with the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, please feel free to contact Harmony Law.

About the Author

Clyde Hutchins

Clyde Hutchins is the founder of Harmony Law. Prior to opening Harmony Law, Mr. Hutchins worked in the Wyoming Attorney General's Office for several years where he developed a strong consumer protection enforcement unit. In that position he led over 120 investigations and enforcement actions under the Consumer Protection Act. He worked on numerous joint cases with the Federal Trade Commission and other states, including Colorado, on consumer protection matters. Mr. Hutchins is also a contributing author to Consumer Protection Law Developments, Second Edition. Previous to his work in the Attorney General's Office, Mr. Hutchins was in private practice in Anchorage, Alaska where he was the chief litigator for a firm. Mr. Hutchins represented municipalities on various matters. Mr. Hutchins provided counsel to businesses and investment advisors regarding compliance with securities laws. He was also a bond lawyer and worked on municipal financing matters. Prior to that, Mr. Hutchins practiced civil litigation with a law firm in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Mr. Hutchins devotes his spare time to his family, traveling and enjoying the great outdoors.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates

Naca badge medium blue grey 0

Harmony Law is one of the few law firms in Colorado and Wyoming that focuses on consumer law. Mr. Hutchins is a member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and state chair for Wyoming. If you have a consumer law issue, please feel free to call 970-488-1857 and speak with Mr. Hutchins.

Explore your Options

It is difficult to make important decisions without knowing all your options. Explore your options with Harmony Law and you will be better equipped to make the right decision in your legal affairs.

Menu